“The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 2” Review

MV5BNjQzNDI2NTU1Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNTAyMDQ5NjE@._V1_SX214_AL_

The “Hunger Games” series has been a fantastic ride. As someone who doesn’t care for the books, I found myself eating up the movies, especially “Catching Fire”. Now comes the much-anticipated conclusion, “Mockingjay Part 2″. I’ve been very excited about it, if a little apprehensive. My fear was that Part 2 would just feel like a second part of one movie, rather than its own thing. But still, I had high hopes for “Mockingjay Part 2″. After knocking it out of the park so thoroughly with the others, Lionsgate had to have something amazing up their sleeves.

Too bad it sucks.

The story of “Mockingjay Part 2″ is pretty much a continuation of Part 1. Katniss is now in District 13, and after a bunch of buildup the time has come to strike at the Capitol. Sounds fun, right? The problem is they squandered a cool premise on a poor story. There’s a ton of big reveals that are completely mishandled, either obviously telegraphed or treated like they’re nothing. SPOILERS For example, when Boggs tells Katniss that rebel leader President Coin is banking on her dying so she can become a martyr for the cause, it happens with no buildup but is also not very surprising. It’s kind of like telling Katniss “Hey, that obviously evil new president wants you to get yourself killed. Have a nice day.”

Oh yeah, here’s a still of a scene with an obvious plot twist.

Unlike the other films, “Mockingjay Part 2″ is boring. Aside from a very tense sequence in the Capitol sewers, nothing kept me on the edge of my seat. There’s long stretches where Katniss and friends are waiting around for something to do, then something happens, then it’s over in five seconds. Much of the film is just padded out to fill the overlong runtime, especially the endless epilogue. You can tell while watching that “Mockingjay” really should have been one film, but the lure of double the money was just too much for Lionsgate and they paid for it.

Also, would it kill you to have a little levity? I get that the world of “The Hunger Games” is dark, but you’ve got to give us some semblance of hope! In “Mockingjay Part 2″ there’s never a sense of fun to go along with the darkness. It’s just drab, dull and depressing. By the end of the film Katniss has completely pissed away any good will she once had, the rebels turn out to be just as bad as the Capitol, and you can count the sympathetic characters on one hand. Again, I’m fine with darkness, but “Mockingjay Part 2″ has no levity or balance whatsoever.

Now, “Mockingjay Part 2″ does have some redeeming qualities. Most of the acting is still top notch. Even though I found Katniss going off the deep-end from anti-hero to straight up villain, I still thought Jennifer Lawrence did an excellent job. When does she not? I also thought that Josh Hutcherson was really given his time to shine and showed a lot of emotional vulnerability that made Peeta very sympathetic. The older veterans are also very good, particularly Donald Sutherland as the deliciously evil President Snow. Seriously, this guy could be running a children’s hospital and you’d still cower in fear.

Unfortunately, as a larger package “Mockingjay Part 2″ fails miserably. It’s a disappointing conclusion to an otherwise great franchise, possibly the biggest letdown of the year for me. I think this one is down to its slavish faithfulness to the book. If there’s one thing that struck me about the movie, it’s how un-cinematic it was. If you want your book to make a compelling film, you have to adapt, now just translate what’s on the page. That makes a boring movie.

Now I’m kind of hoping for some prequels to redeem the “Hunger Games” name. Maybe “Panem Begins” or “President Snow: The College Years”.

Score: 3/10

My Reaction to the Oscar Nominees

The 85th Academy Awards® will air live on Oscar® Sunday, February 24, 2013.

The Oscars are always one of my favorite events of year. Even when I don’t agree with some of the nominees and winners, it’s still a fun show and I love having a celebration of the year in film. Well, the nominees for the 87th Academy Awards were announced a few days ago, and I’ve finally gotten all my thoughts on them straight.

DISCLAIMER: All film is subjective, so just like my reviews this list will be completely opinion-based.

BEST PICTURE

American Sniper: This should definitely not be on here. Great lead performance, bad movie.

Birdman: Terrific. This belongs here, and is probably gonna be the winner.

Boyhood: This is my pick for most overrated movie of the year. It wasn’t bad, but I wasn’t enthralled by it like most people.

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Sure, why not?

The Imitation Game: My favorite movie on this list, but it doesn’t have a strong chance of winning.

Selma: CONTROVERSY: It was just okay. Not worth a nomination in my opinion.

The Theory of Everything: Very nice to see this nominated.

Whiplash: Even nicer to see this nominated. One of the best movies of the year, and it gets better every time I see it. If I haven’t seen it I won’t comment.

Will win: Either Birdman or Boyhood

BIRDMAN, l-r Michael Keaton, Benjamin Kanes, 2014. TM and Copyright ©Fox Searchlight

Unknown

Should win: The Imitation Game

Unknown

BEST ACTOR

Steve Carrell, Foxcatcher

Bradley Cooper, American Sniper: In a weaker year, I would’ve put him on here. But this was a stacked year, and I would rather have seen David Oyelowo or Jake Gyllenhaal in his spot.

Benedict Cumberbatch, The Imitation Game: He belongs here for sure.

Michael Keaton, Birdman: So does he. One of Keaton’s best performances.

Eddie Redmayne, The Theory of Everything: Yet another extremely strong contender. This is Redmayne’s best performance to date.

Will and should win: Michael Keaton, Birdman

michael-keaton-birdman

BEST ACTRESS

Marion Cotillard, Two Days, One Night

Felicity Jones, The Theory of Everything: I loved her performance. She belongs her for sure.

Julianne Moore, Still Alice

Rosamund Pike, Gone Girl: YES YES YES!! I would’ve freaked out if she wasn’t nominated.

Reese Witherspoon, Wild

Will win: Julianne Moore, Still Alice

Julianne-Moore-in-Still-Alice

Should win: Rosamund Pike, Gone Girl

Unknown

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

Robert Duvall, The Judge: He’s got no chance, but he was the best part of that movie and deserves a nomination.

Ethan Hawke, Boyhood: He should be on here. The parents in Boyhood were much more compelling than Mason.

Edward Norton, Birdman: Another great performance in a movie filled with them.

Mark Ruffalo, Foxcatcher

J.K. Simmons, Whiplash: This is a very strong category, but I don’t see how he doesn’t win.

Will and should win: J.K. Simmons, Whiplash

Unknown-1

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

Patricia Arquette, Boyhood: She and Ethan Hawke made the movie watchable for me. That enough is worth win.

Laura Dern, Wild

Keira Knightley, The Imitation Game: Knightley has come a long way in the last few years, and this is a vindication of all her efforts.

Emma Stone, Birdman: She was terrific.

Meryl Streep, Into the Woods: I didn’t like the movie. It was about an hour too long. But Streep was great, same as always.

Will and should win: Patricia Arquette, Boyhood

Unknown

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM: I don’t like this category. It exists only to give the Academy an excuse not to nominate animated films for Best Picture. BUT HOW THE HELL DOES THE LEGO MOVIE NOT GET NOMINATED? I don’t use the term snub lightly, but this is a snub.

Big Hero 6: I loved it. Lots of fun, and yet another credit to Disney.

The Boxtrolls: I enjoyed it, and it’s nice to see it get nominated.

How to Train Your Dragon 2: Without The Lego Movie in competition, this is my clear favorite.

Song of the Sea

The Tale of the Princess Kaguya

Will and should win: How to Train Your Dragon 2

images

BEST DIRECTOR

Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Birdman: This is the first time that I can honestly say he did a great job directing. He did a truly amazing job.

Richard Linklater, Boyhood: I wouldn’t put him on here. I don’t think he did a very good job creating a compelling story. But I appreciate his ambition.

Bennett Miller, Foxcatcher

Wes Anderson, The Grand Budapest Hotel: A good one for Anderson to get nominated for.

Morten Tyldum, The Imitation Game: It wasn’t very showy direction, but Tyldum told this story very well and pulled good performances out of everyone.

Will and should win: Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Birdman

Unknown

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

Jason Hall, American Sniper: No thanks.

Graham Moore, The Imitation Game: I’m surprised this is Moore’s first screenplay. He did a fantastic job.

Paul Thomas Anderson, Inherent Vice: I love PTA, but this screenplay was not a strong one.

Anthony McCarten, The Theory of Everything: A great screenplay. He deserves the nomination.

Damien Chazelle, Whiplash: Yet another great screenplay.

Will win: Too close to call.

Should win: Graham Moore, The Imitation Game

Unknown

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris, Jr. and Armando Bo, Birdman: With a movie this good, how can the screenplay not be nominated?

Richard Linklater, Boyhood: I wouldn’t give it to him, but I understand why he’s nominated. I was an ambitious effort.

E. Max Frye and Dan Futterman, Foxcatcher

Wes Anderson and Hugo Guinness (story), The Grand Budapest Hotel: I’m kind of surprised to see this get so many nominations, but I can’t complain.

Dan Gilroy, Nightcrawler: A better movie than any of these, and yet this is its only nomination. Glad to see it get something.

Will win: All those unpronounceable names, Birdman

images

Should win: Dan Gilroy, Nightcrawler

images

So, there’s all the big ones. I might not agree with all the Academy’s decisions, but that doesn’t matter. Like all art forms, film is subjective, and it’s nice to see that people have varying opinions. I’m sure this year’s show will be a lot of fun, especially with all of the surprises. The Lego Movie not getting nominated is insane, though.

“The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part I” Review

Sorry this one’s so late. I’ve been a little busy and have been working on other projects. I’m free for the time being and will try to post regularly.

MockingjayPart1Poster3

Starring Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Elizabeth Banks, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Julianne Moore, Donald Sutherland, Natalie Dormer, Sam Claflin, Jena Malone, Stanley Tucci, and Willow Shields. Written by Danny Strong and Peter Craig. Directed by Francis Lawrence. Rated PG-13 for for intense sequences of violence and action, some disturbing images and thematic material. 123 minutes.

I tend to get raked over the coals whenever I say this, but I wasn’t a big fan of the first Hunger Games. I thought it was okay, but it was nothing special or memorable. So imagine my surprise when I thought Catching Fire was great. It was everything that the first one should’ve been, with great action, great characters, and great storytelling, all in the surprisingly deft hands of director Francis Lawrence. Now we have the penultimate film, Mockingjay Part I. It’s had a lot of buzz and a great marketing campaign surrounding it, and has already made more money than the vast majority of people can even dream of. However, it’s has also been the most divisive film of the series, with reviews being more mixed than the previous two. How does it measure up? Read on to find out.

Premise: After accidentally sabotaging the most recent Hunger Games, Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) is spirited away to the mysterious District 13, home to a growing rebel group. Now she must become the face of the revolution in a propaganda war against the Capitol.

Pros: Ever since Catching Fire, I’ve been on the Jennifer Lawrence hype train full stop. Gone are the days when she was just an up-and-comer. She is the real deal, and Mockingjay continues the trend. Katniss has always been reluctant, not really wanting to be a hero at all. But here she’s growing into her role as the symbol around which the rebels can rally, while still being vulnerable. A lot of this is down to Lawrence, who is so good that she can make even an uninteresting character enthrall you just by her sheer screen presence.

KATNISS

A good villain can bring a lot to any movie, and President Snow is the perfect choice for this series. I thought Donald Sutherland did a superb job in the first two, and even though he’s not in Mockingjay all that much it just might show him at his best. Snow is a political force to be reckoned with, and you can tell why people would want to follow him, whether it’s out of fear, admiration, of both. But then you also see the destruction he and his government have caused, showing what an irredeemable prick he is. Also, bonus points for being extremely creepy.

coriolanus-snow-president-of-panem

The supporting cast (who aren’t in it nearly enough, but I’ll get to that later) is also solid. The two standouts are Julianne Moore and Philip Seymour Hoffman, two esteemed acting veterans (and Paul Thomas Anderson alumni). Hoffman reprises his role as Plutarch Heavensbee, now revealed to be utterly committed to the downfall of the Capitol. It’s very sad that he’s no longer with us, but we can at least marvel at what a great performer he was. Julianne Moore is also fantastic as President Coin, someone who has dedicated her life to ending the hardships of the common man but has lost her family and is willing to get her hands dirty. These two also play off each other very well, and are an absolute joy to watch together.

Mockingjay sets itself apart from the rest of the series in a very interesting way. There is very little action, and instead we got a sci-fi drama that is probably the most engaging thing the series has offered so far. Katniss has already been through so much, having to become a hardened killer and being celebrated for it by an upper-class that you’d be a saint not to resent. Now she sees the rebellion firsthand, and we get a good look at the brutality of the Capitol and just why President Snow should be overthrown. Powerful stuff, and a great setup for what I’m hoping is a terrific finale.

Cons: This might sound weird given that the film is about her, but there’s too much Katniss and not enough of everybody else. Peeta’s barely in it, and even though Gale has perhaps more screentime than either of the previous two movies, he’s not given a lot of focus either (not that Liam Hemsworth’s acting is a great loss). Great characters such as Hamitch, Finnick, and Joanna are also given hardly any focus. In fact, I don’t even think Joanna had a single line of dialogue. Even though she’s the protagonist, this series is ultimately too Katniss-centric. Even though I loved the movie, I wish I could’ve seen more development of the world around her, potentially cool characters like Cressida (played by the stunningly talented and stunningly…stunning Natalie Dormer) given more of a chance, and the hardships of the ordinary District citizens more fleshed out.

mockingjay-part-1-katniss-photo

For the third time, I don’t buy the love story between Katniss and Peeta. They always seem more like really good friends, not soulmates. On the other hand, I’m glad the romance was downplayed.

Verdict: Mockingjay Part I is a magnificent drama that easily matches Catching Fire and blows the original Hunger Games out of the water. Were there weaknesses? Sure, and I get why some people are underwhelmed by it. Still, I had a blast, and now I can wait for the second part.

Score: B+

Non-Stop Review

Premise: A supposedly badass air marshall must uncover a murderous plot on board A PLANE! Starring Liam Neeson, Julianne Moore, Michelle Dockery, and Lupita Nyong’o.

Pros: Well, if I have to grasp at straws, Liam Neeson does what he can with a pretty sub-par character. But then again, it’s Liam Neeson. What else should we expect? And what action there is turns out to be pretty exciting.

Cons: Pretty much everything else. Really, I could be here literally all night. But I’m gonna save you some time and just share with you what I really hated; the disposability of the plot. My jaw was on the floor, amazed by the sheer lack of dramatic tension. Everything just sort of happens, with no really rhyme or reason. The first two acts are incredibly predictable, and you’ve probably seen most, if not all, of the twists and turns somewhere else. But the third act has a twist that is so mind-bendingly illogical and stupid that even if I loved the movie, I would’ve ended up merely liking it. Seriously, it’s an ending horrible on a Taking of Pelham 123 (the ending, not the movie itself) scale. And I just know this one’s been said before, but for a movie called Non-Stop, it’s painfully slow and boring, with far less action and thrills than one would expect.

Verdict: I’m in shock that this movie currently has the minimum fresh rating on RT. It’s like The Woman in Black all over again. Overall, I give Non-Stop 2.5 out of 10. What a waste of my time. Ugh.