“Kong: Skull Island” Movie Review

Kong_Skull_Island_poster

(via Wikipedia, Kong: Skull Island is property of Warner Bros.)

Premise: In 1973, a motley crew of scientists, soldiers, and a photographer go on a mission to discovery the secrets of the mysterious Skull Island. However, as soon as they get there they’re attacked by the king of monsters (sorry Godzilla), Kong. Now our heroes brave the treacherous jungle and make their way back to the rendezvous point in time to be rescued.

I love a good monster movie, and anything with the world’s greatest giant ape will immediately catch my interest. The original King Kong is a classic, and I enjoyed the Peter Jackson-directed remake quite a bit. It’s been over a decade since we’ve seen Kong onscreen, but Kong: Skull Island looked like the perfect reintroduction. I haven’t seen director Jordan Vogt-Roberts’ debut Kings of Summer, but I hear it’s very good and I was interested in seeing how he’d transition into a blockbuster. It’s Kong’s introduction into a cinematic universe where he’ll hopefully fight Godzilla. But the most promising thing about this movie was the cast. Here’s a rundown:

-Tom Hiddleston, Samuel L. Jackson, John Goodman, Brie Larson, John C. Reilly, Toby Kebbell (Koba from Dawn of the Planet of the Apes) Corey Hawkins and Jason Mitchell of Straight Outta Compton, etc.

Great cast, right? So while my anticipation for Kong: Skull Island wasn’t on the level of something like Logan, it was definitely on my radar and I was very excited. Did it live up to my expectations? Not quite.

Pros: When going into a monster movie of this type, my number one question is “where are the monster fights and how good are they?” The recent Godzilla had great fights, but we didn’t see enough of them. Warner Bros. clearly learned their lesson here. They greatly increased the action quotient for Kong: Skull Island and did a great job making all of it exciting. There’s something to be said for a movie like Jaws with a slow build-up and very little of the shark, but for an action-oriented monster movie the Kong: Skull Island approach is the right one. You get to see the ultimate Kong vs. humans vs. other monsters throwdown, and it’s a thing of beauty.

kong_watermarked

(via ComingSoon.net, courtesy of Empire Magazine)

The filmmakers also did a good job setting up Kong and his world. Kong himself is lovingly realized, a wonderful creation played very well by mo-cap actor Terry Notary. Not only is he a cool looking monster, he’s the most interesting character in the movie. He’s not just some dumb wild animal, but the god of Skull Island protecting his turf. He may be destructive, but he’s ultimately a savior delivering the natives from even more dangerous creatures. Just don’t get on his bad side! Skull Island is also a very interesting location. The stylized visual effects might throw you off, but once you get past that it’s a great place for an adventure, one I wouldn’t mind revisiting soon.

Cons: There is not a bad actor in Kong: Skull Island. They’ve all done great work and will do great work again. However, nearly all of them are wasted in this movie. It’s not that they’re bad (they all do fine with what they’re given), but most of them have nothing to do other than look scared/badass, run around, and shoot things. Seriously, I could give most of them a one-to-five word description and that would be their entire character. The only ones with anything to them are Samuel L. Jackson and John C. Reilly. I cared about their characters and wanted to see where their stories went, but they didn’t make up for the fact that the rest of their cast got table scraps.

I’m not suggesting Kong: Skull Island be Shakespeare, but I didn’t find it that well written. There’s very little character development, with familiar faces popping in with no real reason except “we need this stock character”. Most of the humor falls completely flat, being awkward rather than amusing. To my immense disappointment, one of the screenwriters was Dan Gilroy, writer/director of the excellent Nightcrawler. I also hear that Kings of Summer was basically all about character development. Where was it here?

Verdict: Overall, Kong: Skull Island is a bit of a mixed bag. It’s great to see Kong and action’s terrific, but most of the characters are half-baked nonentities that are hard to root for, especially when Kong himself is so cool. It’s not a bad movie, but I think you can wait for Netflix.

Score: C+

My Reaction to the Oscar Nominees

The 85th Academy Awards® will air live on Oscar® Sunday, February 24, 2013.

The Oscars are always one of my favorite events of year. Even when I don’t agree with some of the nominees and winners, it’s still a fun show and I love having a celebration of the year in film. Well, the nominees for the 87th Academy Awards were announced a few days ago, and I’ve finally gotten all my thoughts on them straight.

DISCLAIMER: All film is subjective, so just like my reviews this list will be completely opinion-based.

BEST PICTURE

American Sniper: This should definitely not be on here. Great lead performance, bad movie.

Birdman: Terrific. This belongs here, and is probably gonna be the winner.

Boyhood: This is my pick for most overrated movie of the year. It wasn’t bad, but I wasn’t enthralled by it like most people.

The Grand Budapest Hotel: Sure, why not?

The Imitation Game: My favorite movie on this list, but it doesn’t have a strong chance of winning.

Selma: CONTROVERSY: It was just okay. Not worth a nomination in my opinion.

The Theory of Everything: Very nice to see this nominated.

Whiplash: Even nicer to see this nominated. One of the best movies of the year, and it gets better every time I see it. If I haven’t seen it I won’t comment.

Will win: Either Birdman or Boyhood

BIRDMAN, l-r Michael Keaton, Benjamin Kanes, 2014. TM and Copyright ©Fox Searchlight

Unknown

Should win: The Imitation Game

Unknown

BEST ACTOR

Steve Carrell, Foxcatcher

Bradley Cooper, American Sniper: In a weaker year, I would’ve put him on here. But this was a stacked year, and I would rather have seen David Oyelowo or Jake Gyllenhaal in his spot.

Benedict Cumberbatch, The Imitation Game: He belongs here for sure.

Michael Keaton, Birdman: So does he. One of Keaton’s best performances.

Eddie Redmayne, The Theory of Everything: Yet another extremely strong contender. This is Redmayne’s best performance to date.

Will and should win: Michael Keaton, Birdman

michael-keaton-birdman

BEST ACTRESS

Marion Cotillard, Two Days, One Night

Felicity Jones, The Theory of Everything: I loved her performance. She belongs her for sure.

Julianne Moore, Still Alice

Rosamund Pike, Gone Girl: YES YES YES!! I would’ve freaked out if she wasn’t nominated.

Reese Witherspoon, Wild

Will win: Julianne Moore, Still Alice

Julianne-Moore-in-Still-Alice

Should win: Rosamund Pike, Gone Girl

Unknown

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

Robert Duvall, The Judge: He’s got no chance, but he was the best part of that movie and deserves a nomination.

Ethan Hawke, Boyhood: He should be on here. The parents in Boyhood were much more compelling than Mason.

Edward Norton, Birdman: Another great performance in a movie filled with them.

Mark Ruffalo, Foxcatcher

J.K. Simmons, Whiplash: This is a very strong category, but I don’t see how he doesn’t win.

Will and should win: J.K. Simmons, Whiplash

Unknown-1

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

Patricia Arquette, Boyhood: She and Ethan Hawke made the movie watchable for me. That enough is worth win.

Laura Dern, Wild

Keira Knightley, The Imitation Game: Knightley has come a long way in the last few years, and this is a vindication of all her efforts.

Emma Stone, Birdman: She was terrific.

Meryl Streep, Into the Woods: I didn’t like the movie. It was about an hour too long. But Streep was great, same as always.

Will and should win: Patricia Arquette, Boyhood

Unknown

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM: I don’t like this category. It exists only to give the Academy an excuse not to nominate animated films for Best Picture. BUT HOW THE HELL DOES THE LEGO MOVIE NOT GET NOMINATED? I don’t use the term snub lightly, but this is a snub.

Big Hero 6: I loved it. Lots of fun, and yet another credit to Disney.

The Boxtrolls: I enjoyed it, and it’s nice to see it get nominated.

How to Train Your Dragon 2: Without The Lego Movie in competition, this is my clear favorite.

Song of the Sea

The Tale of the Princess Kaguya

Will and should win: How to Train Your Dragon 2

images

BEST DIRECTOR

Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Birdman: This is the first time that I can honestly say he did a great job directing. He did a truly amazing job.

Richard Linklater, Boyhood: I wouldn’t put him on here. I don’t think he did a very good job creating a compelling story. But I appreciate his ambition.

Bennett Miller, Foxcatcher

Wes Anderson, The Grand Budapest Hotel: A good one for Anderson to get nominated for.

Morten Tyldum, The Imitation Game: It wasn’t very showy direction, but Tyldum told this story very well and pulled good performances out of everyone.

Will and should win: Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Birdman

Unknown

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

Jason Hall, American Sniper: No thanks.

Graham Moore, The Imitation Game: I’m surprised this is Moore’s first screenplay. He did a fantastic job.

Paul Thomas Anderson, Inherent Vice: I love PTA, but this screenplay was not a strong one.

Anthony McCarten, The Theory of Everything: A great screenplay. He deserves the nomination.

Damien Chazelle, Whiplash: Yet another great screenplay.

Will win: Too close to call.

Should win: Graham Moore, The Imitation Game

Unknown

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris, Jr. and Armando Bo, Birdman: With a movie this good, how can the screenplay not be nominated?

Richard Linklater, Boyhood: I wouldn’t give it to him, but I understand why he’s nominated. I was an ambitious effort.

E. Max Frye and Dan Futterman, Foxcatcher

Wes Anderson and Hugo Guinness (story), The Grand Budapest Hotel: I’m kind of surprised to see this get so many nominations, but I can’t complain.

Dan Gilroy, Nightcrawler: A better movie than any of these, and yet this is its only nomination. Glad to see it get something.

Will win: All those unpronounceable names, Birdman

images

Should win: Dan Gilroy, Nightcrawler

images

So, there’s all the big ones. I might not agree with all the Academy’s decisions, but that doesn’t matter. Like all art forms, film is subjective, and it’s nice to see that people have varying opinions. I’m sure this year’s show will be a lot of fun, especially with all of the surprises. The Lego Movie not getting nominated is insane, though.